1. If more than one party has ownership interest in the land, building and/or business operations that are located within the project boundaries, have all such parties assigned authority to register this project in the Nori market, on behalf of all parties, to the person identified herein as the project's Primary Contact?

Yes

No, this project does not have confirmed, legal ownership.

2. Is this project independent of other registries and programs and is there no conflict of interest where this project has been issued any form of credit representing real interest in the carbon removal claims outlined in the application by any other registry or market administrator?

Yes

No, this project not independent of other registries and programs.

3. Is the data the applicant submitted to Nori reasonable given the operating records (e.g. invoices, receipts, etc.) and any other evidence to which the Verifier was granted access by the applicant?

Yes

No

4. Does the data or evidence found in the applicant's operating records meet with the Nori Guidelines definition for completeness and accuracy?

Yes

No, this project does not meet my standards as a professional verifier.

Positive - reasonable assurance

Positive - reasonable assurance with qualifications

Neutral - limited assurance

Adverse - no assurance

Verification summary

The key findings of this verification are that the project owner is practicing no till and is using the regenerative agriculture practice of planting the crop directly into the living winter cover crop. For this verification, one of the challenges was securing the necessary signatures on documents assigning the project owner with the rights to any carbon and associated NRTs garnered through this project. One landowner was not available to correct one a document and those fields were removed from the project at this time.